Abstract
Within K-12 education there are a vast number of pedagogical approaches that utilize “places”. These approaches are typically lumped together with a catch-all term of “place-based education”. This creates confusion as not all approaches that use place should be identified as place-based education. The purpose of this paper is to establish clarity of the definitions for place-based education in the field. We adapted three examples from Edupotia, a public educational website, all titled “place-based education”, and analyzed them through the lens of the following educational philosophies: essentialism, progressivism, and social reconstructionism. The goal of this paper is to reduce confusion in the literature and strengthen the use of place-based education as it benefits both students and the surrounding community. By clearly defining place-based education, the pedagogy can be implemented and studied using a succinct set of parameters, creating cohesion in the field. Additionally, the strengthening and adoption of a universal definition aids in teacher professional development and education by reducing barriers to entry that result from discipline-specific training.
License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Article Type: Research Article
Agricultural and Environmental Education, Volume 5, Issue 1, June 2026, Article No: em014
https://doi.org/10.29333/agrenvedu/18614
Publication date: 27 May 2026
Article Views: 4
Article Downloads: 2
Open Access References How to cite this article
Full Text (PDF)